Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 620 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 620
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
- 3.9x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 58 Watt
- 32x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 1 GB
- 4.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1042 vs 220
- 5.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 241 vs 44
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2227 vs 1686
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2227 vs 1686
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 September 2017 vs 26 January 2010 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 65 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 58 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1042 vs 220 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 241 vs 44 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2227 vs 1686 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2227 vs 1686 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
- 4.5x more core clock speed: 1360 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 2x more pipelines: 48 vs 24
- Around 28% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5892 vs 4592
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1360 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 48 vs 24 |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5892 vs 4592 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1042 | 220 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 241 | 44 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4592 | 5892 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.062 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 273.504 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.777 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.939 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 31.881 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1397 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 878 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2227 | 1686 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1397 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 878 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2227 | 1686 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 62 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel UHD Graphics 620 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Tesla |
| Code name | Kaby Lake GT2 | G94 |
| Launch date | 1 September 2017 | 26 January 2010 |
| Place in performance rating | 1380 | 1583 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $79.99 | |
| Price now | $79.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 5.72 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1360 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 48 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 58 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 505 million |
| CUDA cores | 48 | |
| Floating-point performance | 144 gflops | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
| Texture fill rate | 14.4 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, VGADVIHDMI |
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF + HDA | |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 6.6" (16.8 cm) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.1 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory type | LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Memory bandwidth | 25.3 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 790 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| CUDA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel UHD Graphics 620 with others
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
ATIMobility Radeon 7500
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
ATIAll-In-Wonder 9000 PRO
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M340
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 910M
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
IntelHD Graphics 520
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8370D IGP
