Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 620 and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 620
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 55 nm
- 10x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 32x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 76% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1042 vs 591
- 4.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 241 vs 54
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 September 2017 vs 4 March 2009 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 55 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 150 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1042 vs 591 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 241 vs 54 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250
- 6.1x more core clock speed: 1836 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 5.3x more pipelines: 128 vs 24
- 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3108 vs 878
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 2227
- 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3108 vs 878
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 2227
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1836 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 128 vs 24 |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3108 vs 878 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 2227 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3108 vs 878 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 2227 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1042 | 591 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 241 | 54 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4592 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.062 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 273.504 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.777 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.939 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 31.881 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1397 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 878 | 3108 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2227 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1397 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 878 | 3108 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2227 | 3351 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 62 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel UHD Graphics 620 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Tesla |
| Code name | Kaby Lake GT2 | G92B |
| Launch date | 1 September 2017 | 4 March 2009 |
| Place in performance rating | 1380 | 1021 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
| Price now | $114.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 9.91 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1836 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 55 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 128 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 754 million |
| CUDA cores | 128 | |
| Floating-point performance | 387.1 gflops | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
| Texture fill rate | 47.2 billion / sec | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, Two Dual Link DVI |
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 9" (228.6 mm) (22.9 cm) | |
| SLI options | 2-way3-way | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.0 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory type | LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Memory bandwidth | 70.4 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel UHD Graphics 620 with others
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
ATIMobility Radeon 7500
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
ATIAll-In-Wonder 9000 PRO
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M340
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 910M
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
IntelHD Graphics 520
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8370D IGP
