Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 620 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 620

• Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
• 5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
• 8x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 4 GB

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)

• 4.5x more core clock speed: 1354 MHz vs 300 MHz
• Around 30% higher boost clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 1150 MHz
• 26.7x more pipelines: 640 vs 24
• 4.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4463 vs 1042
• Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 292 vs 241
• 3.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17466 vs 4592
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 67.209 vs 27.062
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 799.414 vs 273.504
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.536 vs 1.777
• Around 53% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.523 vs 19.939
• 7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 223.683 vs 31.881
• 5.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7239 vs 1397
• 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3721 vs 878
• Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 2227
• 5.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7239 vs 1397
• 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3721 vs 878
• Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 2227
• 33.6x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2084 vs 62

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1042 4463
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	241 292
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4592 17466
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.062 67.209
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	273.504 799.414
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.777 4.536
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.939 30.523
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31.881 223.683
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1397 7239
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	878 3721
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2227 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1397 7239
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	878 3721
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2227 3359
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	62 2084

Compare specifications (specs)