Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 620 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 620

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1033 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 8.9x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 134 Watt
• 16x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.062 vs 25.21

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

• 3.3x more core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 32x more pipelines: 768 vs 24
• 3.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3388 vs 1042
• Around 93% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 465 vs 241
• 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9482 vs 4592
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 561.43 vs 273.504
• Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.026 vs 1.777
• Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.868 vs 19.939
• Around 60% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 51.009 vs 31.881
• 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3426 vs 1397
• 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3642 vs 878
• Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3242 vs 2227
• 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3426 vs 1397
• 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3642 vs 878
• Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3242 vs 2227
• 17.8x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1106 vs 62

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1042 3388
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	241 465
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4592 9482
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.062 25.21
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	273.504 561.43
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.777 2.026
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.939 30.868
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31.881 51.009
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1397 3426
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	878 3642
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2227 3242
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1397 3426
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	878 3642
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2227 3242
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	62 1106

Compare specifications (specs)