Intel UHD Graphics 620 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 620 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 620
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 11% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1150 MHz versus 1033 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 8.9x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 134 Watt
- 16x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 32 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.062 versus 25.21
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 versus 26 March 2013 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1150 MHz versus 1033 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 134 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 32 GB versus 2 GB |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.062 versus 25.21 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
- 3.3x plus de vitesse du noyau: 980 MHz versus 300 MHz
- 32x plus de pipelines: 768 versus 24
- 3.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3388 versus 1042
- Environ 93% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 465 versus 241
- 2.1x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 9482 versus 4592
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 561.43 versus 273.504
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.026 versus 1.777
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.868 versus 19.939
- Environ 60% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 51.009 versus 31.881
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3426 versus 1397
- 4.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3642 versus 878
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3242 versus 2227
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3426 versus 1397
- 4.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3642 versus 878
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3242 versus 2227
- 17.8x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1106 versus 62
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 980 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 768 versus 24 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3388 versus 1042 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 465 versus 241 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9482 versus 4592 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 561.43 versus 273.504 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.026 versus 1.777 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.868 versus 19.939 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 51.009 versus 31.881 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3426 versus 1397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3642 versus 878 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3242 versus 2227 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3426 versus 1397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3642 versus 878 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3242 versus 2227 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1106 versus 62 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1042 | 3388 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 241 | 465 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4592 | 9482 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.062 | 25.21 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 273.504 | 561.43 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.777 | 2.026 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.939 | 30.868 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 31.881 | 51.009 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1397 | 3426 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 878 | 3642 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2227 | 3242 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1397 | 3426 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 878 | 3642 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2227 | 3242 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 62 | 1106 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel UHD Graphics 620 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Kaby Lake GT2 | GK106 |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 | 26 March 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1380 | 810 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $169 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1150 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 768 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 134 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | 2,540 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 768 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,585 gflops | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 97 °C | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 62.7 billion / sec | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Longeur | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | One 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 32 GB | 2 GB |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 144.2 GB / s | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6.0 GB/s | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel UHD Graphics 620 avec des autres
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
ATIMobility Radeon 7500
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
ATIAll-In-Wonder 9000 PRO
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M340
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 910M
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
IntelHD Graphics 520
IntelUHD Graphics 620 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8370D IGP
