Intel UHD Graphics 750 vs AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 750 and AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 750
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 314.8x more texture fill rate: 20.80 GTexel/s vs 66.08 GTexel / s
- 4.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 70 Watt
Launch date | 2021 vs 8 August 2016 |
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 20.80 GTexel/s vs 66.08 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 70 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
- 3.6x more core clock speed: 1090 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 3.5x more pipelines: 896 vs 256
- 10.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 65217 vs 6483
- Around 56% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 55.048 vs 35.179
- Around 78% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 969.655 vs 543.594
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.655 vs 1.995
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 76.807 vs 29.322
- 2.7x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1728 vs 641
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1090 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 896 vs 256 |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 65217 vs 6483 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 55.048 vs 35.179 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 969.655 vs 543.594 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.655 vs 1.995 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 76.807 vs 29.322 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1728 vs 641 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 750
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics 750 | AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1726 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 351 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6483 | 65217 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.179 | 55.048 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 543.594 | 969.655 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.995 | 4.655 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.322 | 76.807 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2899 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3219 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 11068 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2899 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3219 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 11068 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 641 | 1728 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 239.111 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics 750 | AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.1 | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | Rocket Lake GT1 | Baffin |
Launch date | 2021 | 8 August 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 769 | 772 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Design | Radeon RX 400 Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $86 | |
Price now | $179.50 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 26.72 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Compute units | 32 | 14 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1090 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 166.4 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1331 GFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 665.6 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 256 | 896 |
Pixel fill rate | 10.40 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 20.80 GTexel/s | 66.08 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 70 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 2.2 TFLOPs | |
GPU Power | 35-48 Watt | |
Stream Processors | 896 | |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
VGA | ||
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | |
Laptop size | large | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 400 Watt | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 112 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 2.0 | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
PowerTune | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore |