Intel UHD Graphics 750 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 750 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 750
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 11068 vs 3356
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 11068 vs 3356
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2021 vs 21 May 2018 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 11068 vs 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 11068 vs 3356 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
- 4.6x more core clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 17% higher boost clock speed: 1518 MHz vs 1300 MHz
- 3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5119 vs 1724
- Around 65% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 601 vs 364
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8368 vs 2899
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3219
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8368 vs 2899
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3219
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1392 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1518 MHz vs 1300 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5119 vs 1724 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 601 vs 364 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8368 vs 2899 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3219 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8368 vs 2899 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3219 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 750
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel UHD Graphics 750 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1724 | 5119 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 364 | 601 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6447 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.179 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 543.594 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.995 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.322 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2899 | 8368 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3219 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 11068 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2899 | 8368 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3219 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 11068 | 3356 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 641 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel UHD Graphics 750 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.1 | Pascal |
| Code name | Rocket Lake GT1 | GP107 |
| Launch date | 2021 | 21 May 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 748 | 334 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | 1518 MHz |
| Compute units | 32 | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1392 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 166.4 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1331 GFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 665.6 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 256 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 10.40 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 20.80 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,300 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Length | 145 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory |
||
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel UHD Graphics 750 with others
IntelUHD Graphics 750 vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX 5100
IntelUHD Graphics 750 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6700 XL
IntelUHD Graphics 750 vs
ATIRadeon X1050
IntelUHD Graphics 750 vs
ATIRadeon HD 5850
IntelUHD Graphics 750 vs
NVIDIATesla C2070
IntelUHD Graphics 750 vs
IntelIris Pro Graphics P580
