Intel UHD Graphics 750 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 750 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 750

• Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• 357.4x more texture fill rate: 20.80 GTexel/s vs 58.2 GTexel / s
• 5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
• 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 11068 vs 3360
• 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 11068 vs 3360
• 5.3x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 641 vs 122

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)

• 4.3x more core clock speed: 1290 MHz vs 300 MHz
• Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 1300 MHz
• 2.5x more pipelines: 640 vs 256
• 2.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5029 vs 1724
• Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 457 vs 364
• 2.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17466 vs 6447
• Around 91% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 67.209 vs 35.179
• Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 799.414 vs 543.594
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.536 vs 1.995
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.523 vs 29.322
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7043 vs 2899
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3685 vs 3219
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7043 vs 2899
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3685 vs 3219

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 750
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1724 5029
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	364 457
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	6447 17466
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	35.179 67.209
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	543.594 799.414
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.995 4.536
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	29.322 30.523
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2899 7043
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3219 3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11068 3360
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2899 7043
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3219 3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11068 3360
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	641 122

Compare specifications (specs)