Intel UHD Graphics 750 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 750 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 750
- Videocard is newer: launch date 14 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 722.2x more texture fill rate: 20.80 GTexel/s vs 28.8 billion / sec
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 256 vs 192
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 7.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 116 Watt
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1724 vs 1557
- Around 12% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6447 vs 5750
- Around 91% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 35.179 vs 18.461
- Around 53% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 543.594 vs 354.392
- Around 77% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.995 vs 1.125
- Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 29.322 vs 18.511
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2899 vs 2488
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 11068 vs 3322
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2899 vs 2488
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 11068 vs 3322
- Around 99% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 641 vs 322
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2021 vs 15 March 2011 |
Texture fill rate | 20.80 GTexel/s vs 28.8 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 256 vs 192 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 116 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1724 vs 1557 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6447 vs 5750 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.179 vs 18.461 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 543.594 vs 354.392 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.995 vs 1.125 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.322 vs 18.511 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2899 vs 2488 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 11068 vs 3322 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2899 vs 2488 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 11068 vs 3322 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 641 vs 322 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
- 6x more core clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 382 vs 364
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3351 vs 3219
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3351 vs 3219
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 382 vs 364 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3351 vs 3219 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3351 vs 3219 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 750
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics 750 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1724 | 1557 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 364 | 382 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6447 | 5750 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.179 | 18.461 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 543.594 | 354.392 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.995 | 1.125 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.322 | 18.511 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2899 | 2488 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3219 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 11068 | 3322 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2899 | 2488 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3219 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 11068 | 3322 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 641 | 322 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 41.941 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics 750 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.1 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Rocket Lake GT1 | GF116 |
Launch date | 2021 | 15 March 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 748 | 1019 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | |
Price now | $287.59 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 7.49 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | |
Compute units | 32 | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 166.4 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1331 GFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 665.6 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 256 | 192 |
Pixel fill rate | 10.40 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 20.80 GTexel/s | 28.8 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 116 Watt |
CUDA cores | 192 | |
Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 100 °C | |
Transistor count | 1,170 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | Two Dual Link DVI-IMini HDMI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.2 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Length | 8.25" (21 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | One 6-pin | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 98.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1026 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI |