Intel UHD Graphics 750 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 750 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Soutien API, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 750
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 14 ans 4 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 20.80 GTexel/s versus 28.8 billion / sec
- Environ 33% de pipelines plus haut: 256 versus 192
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 40 nm
- 7.7x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 116 Watt
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1724 versus 1557
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 6447 versus 5750
- Environ 91% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 35.179 versus 18.461
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 543.594 versus 354.392
- Environ 77% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.995 versus 1.125
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 29.322 versus 18.511
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2899 versus 2488
- 3.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 11068 versus 3322
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2899 versus 2488
- 3.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 11068 versus 3322
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 641 versus 322
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 2021 versus 15 March 2011 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 20.80 GTexel/s versus 28.8 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 256 versus 192 |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 116 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1724 versus 1557 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6447 versus 5750 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.179 versus 18.461 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 543.594 versus 354.392 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.995 versus 1.125 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.322 versus 18.511 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2899 versus 2488 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 11068 versus 3322 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2899 versus 2488 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 11068 versus 3322 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 641 versus 322 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
- 6x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1800 MHz versus 300 MHz
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 382 versus 364
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3351 versus 3219
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3351 versus 3219
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1800 MHz versus 300 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 382 versus 364 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3351 versus 3219 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3351 versus 3219 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 750
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 750 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1724 | 1557 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 364 | 382 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6447 | 5750 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.179 | 18.461 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 543.594 | 354.392 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.995 | 1.125 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.322 | 18.511 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2899 | 2488 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3219 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 11068 | 3322 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2899 | 2488 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3219 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 11068 | 3322 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 641 | 322 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 41.941 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel UHD Graphics 750 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.1 | Fermi 2.0 |
Nom de code | Rocket Lake GT1 | GF116 |
Date de sortie | 2021 | 15 March 2011 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 748 | 1019 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $149 | |
Prix maintenant | $287.59 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 7.49 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1300 MHz | |
Unités de Compute | 32 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 166.4 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1331 GFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 665.6 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 256 | 192 |
Pixel fill rate | 10.40 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 20.80 GTexel/s | 28.8 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 116 Watt |
Noyaux CUDA | 192 | |
Performance á point flottant | 691.2 gflops | |
Température maximale du GPU | 100 °C | |
Compte de transistor | 1,170 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | Two Dual Link DVI-IMini HDMI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.2 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Longeur | 8.25" (21 cm) | |
Options SLI | 2-way | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | One 6-pin | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 98.4 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1026 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI |