Intel UHD Graphics 750 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 750 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 750
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 20% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 1085 MHz
- 479.3x more texture fill rate: 20.80 GTexel/s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 4x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 60 Watt
- Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 29.322 vs 26.532
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 11068 vs 3329
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 11068 vs 3329
- 5.5x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 641 vs 117
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2021 vs 18 February 2014 |
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz vs 1085 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 20.80 GTexel/s vs 43.4 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 60 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.322 vs 26.532 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 11068 vs 3329 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 11068 vs 3329 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 641 vs 117 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- 3.4x more core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 2.5x more pipelines: 640 vs 256
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3901 vs 1724
- Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 521 vs 364
- Around 79% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11526 vs 6447
- Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.463 vs 35.179
- Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 642.715 vs 543.594
- Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.933 vs 1.995
- Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4843 vs 2899
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 vs 3219
- Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4843 vs 2899
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 vs 3219
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1020 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 640 vs 256 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3901 vs 1724 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 521 vs 364 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11526 vs 6447 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.463 vs 35.179 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 642.715 vs 543.594 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.933 vs 1.995 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4843 vs 2899 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 vs 3219 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4843 vs 2899 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 vs 3219 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 750
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics 750 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1724 | 3901 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 364 | 521 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6447 | 11526 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.179 | 42.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 543.594 | 642.715 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.995 | 2.933 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.322 | 26.532 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2899 | 4843 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3219 | 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 11068 | 3329 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2899 | 4843 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3219 | 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 11068 | 3329 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 641 | 117 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 133.458 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics 750 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.1 | Maxwell |
Code name | Rocket Lake GT1 | GM107 |
Launch date | 2021 | 18 February 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 748 | 707 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | |
Price now | $299.01 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 15.02 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | 1085 MHz |
Compute units | 32 | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1020 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 166.4 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1331 GFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 665.6 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 256 | 640 |
Pixel fill rate | 10.40 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 20.80 GTexel/s | 43.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 60 Watt |
CUDA cores | 640 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops | |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 86.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5.4 GB/s | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
TXAA |