Intel UHD Graphics 750 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 750 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Soutien API, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 750
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 11 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 20% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1300 MHz versus 1085 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 20.80 GTexel/s versus 43.4 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 4x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 60 Watt
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 29.322 versus 26.532
- 3.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 11068 versus 3329
- 3.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 11068 versus 3329
- 5.5x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 641 versus 117
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 2021 versus 18 February 2014 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1300 MHz versus 1085 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 20.80 GTexel/s versus 43.4 GTexel / s |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 60 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.322 versus 26.532 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 11068 versus 3329 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 11068 versus 3329 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 641 versus 117 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- 3.4x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1020 MHz versus 300 MHz
- 2.5x plus de pipelines: 640 versus 256
- 2.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3901 versus 1724
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 521 versus 364
- Environ 79% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 11526 versus 6447
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.463 versus 35.179
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 642.715 versus 543.594
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.933 versus 1.995
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4843 versus 2899
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 versus 3219
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4843 versus 2899
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 versus 3219
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1020 MHz versus 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 640 versus 256 |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3901 versus 1724 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 521 versus 364 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11526 versus 6447 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.463 versus 35.179 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 642.715 versus 543.594 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.933 versus 1.995 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4843 versus 2899 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 versus 3219 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4843 versus 2899 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 versus 3219 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 750
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 750 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1724 | 3901 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 364 | 521 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6447 | 11526 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.179 | 42.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 543.594 | 642.715 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.995 | 2.933 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.322 | 26.532 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2899 | 4843 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3219 | 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 11068 | 3329 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2899 | 4843 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3219 | 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 11068 | 3329 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 641 | 117 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 133.458 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel UHD Graphics 750 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.1 | Maxwell |
Nom de code | Rocket Lake GT1 | GM107 |
Date de sortie | 2021 | 18 February 2014 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 748 | 707 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $149 | |
Prix maintenant | $299.01 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 15.02 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1300 MHz | 1085 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 32 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 1020 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 166.4 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1331 GFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 665.6 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 256 | 640 |
Pixel fill rate | 10.40 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 20.80 GTexel/s | 43.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 60 Watt |
Noyaux CUDA | 640 | |
Performance á point flottant | 1,389 gflops | |
Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... |
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 86.4 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5.4 GB/s | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
TXAA |