Intel UHD Graphics 750 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 750 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 750
- Videocard is newer: launch date 12 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 44% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 900 MHz
- 129.6x more texture fill rate: 20.80 GTexel/s vs 160.5 billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 16.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 11068 vs 3358
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 11068 vs 3358
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2021 vs 23 May 2013 |
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 20.80 GTexel/s vs 160.5 billion / sec |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 11068 vs 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 11068 vs 3358 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
- 2.9x more core clock speed: 863 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 9x more pipelines: 2304 vs 256
- 4.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7986 vs 1724
- Around 62% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 590 vs 364
- 3.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 23233 vs 6447
- Around 64% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 57.735 vs 35.179
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1269.688 vs 543.594
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.505 vs 1.995
- Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 37.407 vs 29.322
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9064 vs 2899
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 3219
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9064 vs 2899
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 3219
- 4.3x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2777 vs 641
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 863 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 256 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7986 vs 1724 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 590 vs 364 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 23233 vs 6447 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 57.735 vs 35.179 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1269.688 vs 543.594 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.505 vs 1.995 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.407 vs 29.322 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9064 vs 2899 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 vs 3219 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9064 vs 2899 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 vs 3219 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2777 vs 641 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 750
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics 750 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1724 | 7986 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 364 | 590 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6447 | 23233 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.179 | 57.735 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 543.594 | 1269.688 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.995 | 5.505 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.322 | 37.407 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2899 | 9064 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3219 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 11068 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2899 | 9064 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3219 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 11068 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 641 | 2777 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 174.323 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics 750 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.1 | Kepler |
Code name | Rocket Lake GT1 | GK110 |
Launch date | 2021 | 23 May 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 748 | 451 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | |
Price now | $740.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 12.94 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | 900 MHz |
Compute units | 32 | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 863 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 166.4 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1331 GFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 665.6 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 256 | 2304 |
Pixel fill rate | 10.40 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 20.80 GTexel/s | 160.5 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 250 Watt |
CUDA cores | 2304 | |
Floating-point performance | 4,156 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 95 °C | |
Transistor count | 7,080 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Minimum recommended system power | 600 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | One 8-pin and one 6-pin | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 288.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
PhysX | ||
TXAA |