NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M vs NVIDIA GeForce 320M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M and NVIDIA GeForce 320M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
• 2.5x more core clock speed: 1120 MHz vs 450 MHz
• 3x more pipelines: 96 vs 32
• 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 523 vs 210
• 2.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 174 vs 59

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 320M

• Around 32% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2474 vs 1875
• 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1735 vs 690
• 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1735 vs 690

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 320M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	523 210
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	174 59
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	1875 2474
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	690 1735
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	690 1735

Compare specifications (specs)