NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M vs NVIDIA GeForce 320M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M and NVIDIA GeForce 320M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- 2.5x more core clock speed: 1120 MHz vs 450 MHz
- 3x more pipelines: 96 vs 32
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 522 vs 210
- 2.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 174 vs 59
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 September 2010 vs 1 April 2010 |
Core clock speed | 1120 MHz vs 450 MHz |
Pipelines | 96 vs 32 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 522 vs 210 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 174 vs 59 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 320M
- Around 32% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2474 vs 1875
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1735 vs 690
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1735 vs 690
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2474 vs 1875 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1735 vs 690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1735 vs 690 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 320M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M | NVIDIA GeForce 320M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 522 | 210 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 174 | 59 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1875 | 2474 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.184 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 172.058 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.459 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.145 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 13.944 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 859 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 719 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 690 | 1735 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 859 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 719 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 690 | 1735 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M | NVIDIA GeForce 320M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | GF108 | MCP89 |
Launch date | 3 September 2010 | 1 April 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 1574 | 1576 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1120 MHz | 450 MHz |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Floating-point performance | 215.04 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | 32 |
Texture fill rate | 6.7 billion / sec | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt | 23 Watt |
Transistor count | 585 million | 486 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 10.1 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Shared memory | 0 | yes |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus |