NVIDIA GeForce 410M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 220

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 410M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 410M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
• 4.8x lower typical power consumption: 12 Watt vs 58 Watt
• Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 267 vs 220
• 3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 130 vs 44

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 220

• Around 18% higher core clock speed: 1360 MHz vs 1150 MHz
• 3.1x more texture fill rate: 14.4 GTexel / s vs 4.6 GTexel / s
• Around 30% better floating-point performance: 144 gflops vs 110.4 gflops
• 5.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5892 vs 1003
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1686 vs 1570
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1686 vs 1570

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 410M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 220

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	267 220
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	130 44
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	1003 5892
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1570 1686
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1570 1686

Compare specifications (specs)