NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 440
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 12% higher memory clock speed: 1796 MHz vs 1600 MHz (GDDR5) or 900 MHz (DDR3)
Launch date | 29 September 2011 vs 1 February 2011 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1796 MHz vs 1600 MHz (GDDR5) or 900 MHz (DDR3) |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 440
- 3.1x more core clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 523 MHz
- 3.1x more texture fill rate: 13.0 billion / sec vs 4.18 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 96 vs 48
- 3.1x better floating-point performance: 311.04 gflops vs 100.42 gflops
- Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 226 vs 169
- 3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 771 vs 255
- 3.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2620 vs 758
- Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2053 vs 1254
- Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2053 vs 1254
- Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3275 vs 1723
- Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3275 vs 1723
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1620 MHz vs 523 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 13.0 billion / sec vs 4.18 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 96 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 311.04 gflops vs 100.42 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 226 vs 169 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 771 vs 255 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2620 vs 758 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2053 vs 1254 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2053 vs 1254 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3275 vs 1723 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3275 vs 1723 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 440
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 169 | 226 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 255 | 771 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 758 | 2620 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1254 | 2053 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1254 | 2053 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1723 | 3275 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1723 | 3275 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.139 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 171.053 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.65 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.729 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.871 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1208 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1208 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Fermi |
Code name | GF119 | GF108 |
Launch date | 29 September 2011 | 1 February 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1348 | 1351 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $79 | |
Price now | $69.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 14.03 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 523 MHz | 1620 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 100.42 gflops | 311.04 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 96 |
Texture fill rate | 4.18 GTexel / s | 13.0 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 65 Watt |
Transistor count | 292 million | 585 million |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 98 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, HDMIVGADual Link DVI |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | 5.7" (14.5 cm) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB GDDR5 or 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.37 GB / s | 28.8 (DDR3) – 51.2 (GDDR5) |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1796 MHz | 1600 MHz (GDDR5) or 900 MHz (DDR3) |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Standard memory config per GPU | 1 GB GDDR5 or 2 GB | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA |