NVIDIA GeForce 710M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 220

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 710M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce 710M

NVIDIA GeForce GT 220

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 710M

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
2x more pipelines: 96 vs 48
2.1x better floating-point performance: 297.6 gflops vs 144 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
3.9x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 58 Watt
2.3x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 790 MHz
2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 454 vs 220
2.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 125 vs 44
Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3325 vs 1686
Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3325 vs 1686

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	24 July 2013 vs 26 January 2010
Pipelines	96 vs 48
Floating-point performance	297.6 gflops vs 144 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 65 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt vs 58 Watt
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz vs 790 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	454 vs 220
PassMark - G2D Mark	125 vs 44
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3325 vs 1686
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3325 vs 1686

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 220

Around 89% higher core clock speed: 1360 MHz vs 719 MHz
Around 16% higher texture fill rate: 14.4 GTexel / s vs 12.4 GTexel / s
2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5892 vs 2457

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1360 MHz vs 719 MHz
Texture fill rate	14.4 GTexel / s vs 12.4 GTexel / s
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	5892 vs 2457

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 710M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 220

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

454

220

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

125

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

2457

5892

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3325

1686

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3325

1686

Name	NVIDIA GeForce 710M	NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
PassMark - G3D Mark	454	220
PassMark - G2D Mark	125	44
Geekbench - OpenCL	2457	5892
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	6.51
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	148.156
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.577
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	11.718
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	19.855
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1030
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3075
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3325	1686
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1030
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3075
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3325	1686
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	0

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce 710M	NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
Essentials
Architecture	Kepler 2.0	Tesla
Code name	GK208	G94
Launch date	24 July 2013	26 January 2010
Place in performance rating	1387	1583
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$79.99
Price now		$79.99
Value for money (0-100)		5.72
Technical info
Boost clock speed	800 MHz
Core clock speed	719 MHz	1360 MHz
Floating-point performance	297.6 gflops	144 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	65 nm
Pipelines	96	48
Texture fill rate	12.4 GTexel / s	14.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	58 Watt
Transistor count	585 million	505 million
CUDA cores		48
Maximum GPU temperature		105 °C
Video outputs and ports
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, VGADVIHDMI
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support	Up to 2560x1600
eDP 1.2 signal support	Up to 2560x1600
HDCP content protection
HDMI
LVDS signal support	Up to 1920x1200
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
VGA аnalog display support	Up to 2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI		S / PDIF + HDA
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bus support	PCI Express 2.0	PCI-E 2.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size	medium sized
Supplementary power connectors	None
Height		4.376" (11.1 cm)
Length		6.6" (16.8 cm)
API support
DirectX	12 API	10.0
OpenCL	1.1
OpenGL	4.5	3.1
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	1 GB
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB / s	25.3 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	790 MHz
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR3
Shared memory	0
Standard memory configuration	DDR3
Technologies
Blu-Ray 3D Support
CUDA
Direct Compute
FXAA
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus