NVIDIA GeForce 800M vs Intel HD Graphics 4000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 800M and Intel HD Graphics 4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 800M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 738 MHz vs 650 MHz
- Around 41% higher texture fill rate: 5.904 GTexel / s vs 4.2 GTexel / s
- 3x more pipelines: 48 vs 16
- 4.2x better floating-point performance: 141.7 gflops vs 33.6 gflops
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 45 Watt
- Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 457 vs 346
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 203 vs 192
- 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1303 vs 539
- Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 15.218 vs 12.009
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 17 March 2014 vs 14 May 2012 |
Core clock speed | 738 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 5.904 GTexel / s vs 4.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 48 vs 16 |
Floating-point performance | 141.7 gflops vs 33.6 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 45 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 457 vs 346 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 203 vs 192 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1303 vs 539 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 15.218 vs 12.009 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4000
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 77% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.712 vs 4.91
- Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 155.638 vs 109.13
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 7.36 vs 7.249
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 754 vs 703
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1492 vs 1123
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2392 vs 1601
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 754 vs 703
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1492 vs 1123
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2392 vs 1601
Specifications (specs) | |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 28 nm |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.712 vs 4.91 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 155.638 vs 109.13 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.36 vs 7.249 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 754 vs 703 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1492 vs 1123 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2392 vs 1601 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 754 vs 703 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1492 vs 1123 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2392 vs 1601 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 800M
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 800M | Intel HD Graphics 4000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 457 | 346 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 203 | 192 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1303 | 539 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.91 | 8.712 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 109.13 | 155.638 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.249 | 7.36 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 15.218 | 12.009 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 703 | 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1123 | 1492 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1601 | 2392 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 703 | 754 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1123 | 1492 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1601 | 2392 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.931 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 800M | Intel HD Graphics 4000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Generation 7.0 |
Code name | GF117 | Ivy Bridge GT2 |
Launch date | 17 March 2014 | 14 May 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1503 | 1506 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 738 MHz | 650 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 141.7 gflops | 33.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 22 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 16 |
Texture fill rate | 5.904 GTexel / s | 4.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 45 Watt |
Transistor count | 585 million | 1,200 million |
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.1 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus | ||
Quick Sync |