NVIDIA GeForce 800M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 800M and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 800M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 34% higher core clock speed: 738 MHz vs 550 MHz
- 3x more pipelines: 48 vs 2x 8
- 3.2x better floating-point performance: 141.7 gflops vs 2x 22.4 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
- 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 40 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 2x 256 MB
- Around 29% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1400 MHz
- 3.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 457 vs 121
- Around 69% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 203 vs 120
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1601 vs 658
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1601 vs 658
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 17 March 2014 vs 20 January 2009 |
Core clock speed | 738 MHz vs 550 MHz |
Pipelines | 48 vs 2x 8 |
Floating-point performance | 141.7 gflops vs 2x 22.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 40 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 2x 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1400 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 457 vs 121 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 203 vs 120 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1601 vs 658 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1601 vs 658 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420
- 4.1x more texture fill rate: 2x 4.4 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 5.904 GTexel / s
Texture fill rate | 2x 4.4 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 5.904 GTexel / s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 800M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 800M | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 457 | 121 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 203 | 120 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1303 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.91 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 109.13 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.249 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 15.218 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 703 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1123 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1601 | 658 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 703 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1123 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1601 | 658 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 800M | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | GF117 | G98 |
Launch date | 17 March 2014 | 20 January 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 1503 | 1501 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $131.43 | |
Price now | $80.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 1.61 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 738 MHz | 550 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 141.7 gflops | 2x 22.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 2x 8 |
Texture fill rate | 5.904 GTexel / s | 2x 4.4 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 40 Watt |
Transistor count | 585 million | 210 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2x 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 2x 11.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 2x 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1400 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus |