NVIDIA GeForce 800M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 430
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 800M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 800M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 49 Watt
- 2x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 800 - 900 MHz (1600 - 1800 data rate)
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 203 vs 198
- Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.91 vs 3.396
- Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 109.13 vs 87.094
- Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 7.249 vs 5.005
- 4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 15.218 vs 3.764
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 17 March 2014 vs 11 October 2010 |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 49 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 800 - 900 MHz (1600 - 1800 data rate) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 203 vs 198 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.91 vs 3.396 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 109.13 vs 87.094 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.249 vs 5.005 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 15.218 vs 3.764 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 430
- Around 90% higher core clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 738 MHz
- Around 90% higher texture fill rate: 11.2 billion / sec vs 5.904 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 96 vs 48
- Around 90% better floating-point performance: 268.8 gflops vs 141.7 gflops
- Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 599 vs 457
- Around 72% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2242 vs 1303
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1080 vs 703
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1713 vs 1123
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1624 vs 1601
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1080 vs 703
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1713 vs 1123
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1624 vs 1601
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 738 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 11.2 billion / sec vs 5.904 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 96 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 268.8 gflops vs 141.7 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 599 vs 457 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2242 vs 1303 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1080 vs 703 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1713 vs 1123 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1624 vs 1601 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1080 vs 703 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1713 vs 1123 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1624 vs 1601 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 800M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 430
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 800M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 457 | 599 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 203 | 198 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1303 | 2242 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.91 | 3.396 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 109.13 | 87.094 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.249 | 5.005 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 15.218 | 3.764 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 703 | 1080 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1123 | 1713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1601 | 1624 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 703 | 1080 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1123 | 1713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1601 | 1624 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.243 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 800M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Fermi |
Code name | GF117 | GF108 |
Launch date | 17 March 2014 | 11 October 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 1503 | 1501 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $79 | |
Price now | $35.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 20.89 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 738 MHz | 1400 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 141.7 gflops | 268.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 96 |
Texture fill rate | 5.904 GTexel / s | 11.2 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 49 Watt |
Transistor count | 585 million | 585 million |
CUDA cores per GPU | 96 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 98 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, HDMIVGA (optional)Mini HDMIDual Link DVI |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Height | 2.713" (6.9 cm) | |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 25.6 - 28.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 800 - 900 MHz (1600 - 1800 data rate) |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus | ||
3D Vision |