NVIDIA GeForce 910M versus AMD Radeon R5 M255
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce 910M and AMD Radeon R5 M255 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 910M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 20% de pipelines plus haut: 384 versus 320
- Environ 80% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1800 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 601 versus 536
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2590 versus 1715
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2590 versus 1715
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 18 August 2015 versus 12 October 2014 |
Pipelines | 384 versus 320 |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 601 versus 536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2590 versus 1715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2590 versus 1715 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R5 M255
- Environ 19% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 925 MHz versus 775 MHz
- Environ 82% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 22.56 GTexel / s versus 12.4 GTexel / s
- 2.4x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 721.9 gflops versus 297.6 gflops
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 135 versus 128
- Environ 77% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4650 versus 2629
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.288 versus 6.448
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 166.596 versus 155.993
- Environ 72% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.988 versus 0.574
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.164 versus 12.2
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 66.631 versus 27.733
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1459 versus 1344
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 versus 3020
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1459 versus 1344
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 versus 3020
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 925 MHz versus 775 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 22.56 GTexel / s versus 12.4 GTexel / s |
Performance á point flottant | 721.9 gflops versus 297.6 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 135 versus 128 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4650 versus 2629 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.288 versus 6.448 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 166.596 versus 155.993 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.988 versus 0.574 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.164 versus 12.2 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 66.631 versus 27.733 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1459 versus 1344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3020 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1459 versus 1344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3020 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 910M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 M255
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce 910M | AMD Radeon R5 M255 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 601 | 536 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 128 | 135 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2629 | 4650 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.448 | 14.288 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 155.993 | 166.596 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.574 | 0.988 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.2 | 20.164 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 27.733 | 66.631 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1344 | 1459 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2590 | 1715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3020 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1344 | 1459 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2590 | 1715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3020 | 3357 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce 910M | AMD Radeon R5 M255 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | GCN 3.0 |
Nom de code | GF117 | Topaz |
Date de sortie | 18 August 2015 | 12 October 2014 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1365 | 1367 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Conception | AMD Radeon R5 200 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 775 MHz | 925 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 297.6 gflops | 721.9 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 320 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 12.4 GTexel / s | 22.56 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | |
Compte de transistor | 585 million | 3,100 million |
Vitesse augmenté | 940 MHz | |
Unités de Compute | 5 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Mémoire |
||
Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | 16 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 64 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
RAM maximale | 4 GB | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
DualGraphics | ||
Enduro | ||
HD3D | ||
Powerplay | ||
PowerTune | ||
Graphiques changeables | ||
ZeroCore |