NVIDIA GeForce 910M vs NVIDIA GeForce 920M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 910M and NVIDIA GeForce 920M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 910M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
| Launch date | 18 August 2015 vs 13 March 2015 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 920M
- Around 23% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 775 MHz
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 716 vs 588
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 119 vs 113
- Around 42% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3722 vs 2629
- Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.358 vs 6.448
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 157.606 vs 155.993
- Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.843 vs 0.574
- Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 15.374 vs 12.2
- Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 40.443 vs 27.733
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1598 vs 1344
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3636 vs 2590
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3020
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1598 vs 1344
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3636 vs 2590
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3020
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 954 MHz vs 775 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 716 vs 588 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 119 vs 113 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3722 vs 2629 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.358 vs 6.448 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 157.606 vs 155.993 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.843 vs 0.574 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.374 vs 12.2 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 40.443 vs 27.733 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1598 vs 1344 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3636 vs 2590 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3020 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1598 vs 1344 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3636 vs 2590 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3020 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 910M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 920M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce 910M | NVIDIA GeForce 920M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 588 | 716 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 113 | 119 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2629 | 3722 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.448 | 8.358 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 155.993 | 157.606 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.574 | 0.843 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.2 | 15.374 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 27.733 | 40.443 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1344 | 1598 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2590 | 3636 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3020 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1344 | 1598 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2590 | 3636 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3020 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 326 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce 910M | NVIDIA GeForce 920M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Kepler 2.0 |
| Code name | GF117 | GK208B |
| Launch date | 18 August 2015 | 13 March 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 1382 | 1297 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 954 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops | 297.6 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Texture fill rate | 12.4 GTexel / s | 12.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 33 Watt |
| Transistor count | 585 million | 585 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Verde Drivers | ||

