NVIDIA GeForce 910M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 910M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA GeForce 910M

NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 910M

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
Around 52% lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 50 Watt
Around 1% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1782 MHz
Around 81% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 27.733 vs 15.32
Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2590 vs 2167
Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2590 vs 2167

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	18 August 2015 vs 24 April 2012
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	33 Watt vs 50 Watt
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz vs 1782 MHz
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	27.733 vs 15.32
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2590 vs 2167
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2590 vs 2167

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM

Around 3% higher core clock speed: 797 MHz vs 775 MHz
2.1x more texture fill rate: 25.5 GTexel / s vs 12.4 GTexel / s
2.1x better floating-point performance: 612.1 gflops vs 297.6 gflops
Around 54% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 9.932 vs 6.448
Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 254.345 vs 155.993
Around 99% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.14 vs 0.574
Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 13.613 vs 12.2
Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1502 vs 1344
Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3334 vs 3020
Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1502 vs 1344
Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3334 vs 3020

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	797 MHz vs 775 MHz
Texture fill rate	25.5 GTexel / s vs 12.4 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance	612.1 gflops vs 297.6 gflops
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	9.932 vs 6.448
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	254.345 vs 155.993
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.14 vs 0.574
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	13.613 vs 12.2
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1502 vs 1344
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3334 vs 3020
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1502 vs 1344
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3334 vs 3020

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 910M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6.448

9.932

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

155.993

254.345

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

0.574

1.14

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

12.2

13.613

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

27.733

15.32

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1344

1502

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2590

2167

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3020

3334

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1344

1502

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2590

2167

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3020

3334

Name	NVIDIA GeForce 910M	NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark	590
PassMark - G2D Mark	120
Geekbench - OpenCL	2629
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	6.448	9.932
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	155.993	254.345
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.574	1.14
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	12.2	13.613
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	27.733	15.32
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1344	1502
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2590	2167
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3020	3334
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1344	1502
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2590	2167
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3020	3334

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce 910M	NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM
Essentials
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	Kepler
Code name	GF117	GK107
Launch date	18 August 2015	24 April 2012
Place in performance rating	1381	1384
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Technical info
Core clock speed	775 MHz	797 MHz
Floating-point performance	297.6 gflops	612.1 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	384	384
Texture fill rate	12.4 GTexel / s	25.5 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	33 Watt	50 Watt
Transistor count	585 million	1,270 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Length		145 mm
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
Memory
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB / s	28.51 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	1782 MHz
Memory type	DDR3	DDR3
Shared memory	0
Maximum RAM amount		2 GB
Technologies
CUDA
GameWorks
GPU Boost
Optimus