NVIDIA GeForce 910M vs AMD Radeon HD 7540D IGP

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 910M and AMD Radeon HD 7540D IGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 910M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
  • Around 2% higher core clock speed: 775 MHz vs 760 MHz
  • Around 36% higher texture fill rate: 12.4 GTexel / s vs 9.12 GTexel / s
  • 2x more pipelines: 384 vs 192
  • Around 2% better floating-point performance: 297.6 gflops vs 291.8 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 32 nm
  • Around 97% lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 65 Watt
  • Around 78% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 590 vs 332
  • 2.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2629 vs 1061
  • 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2590 vs 1153
  • Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3020 vs 2177
  • 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2590 vs 1153
  • Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3020 vs 2177
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 18 August 2015 vs 2 October 2012
Core clock speed 775 MHz vs 760 MHz
Texture fill rate 12.4 GTexel / s vs 9.12 GTexel / s
Pipelines 384 vs 192
Floating-point performance 297.6 gflops vs 291.8 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 32 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 33 Watt vs 65 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 590 vs 332
Geekbench - OpenCL 2629 vs 1061
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2590 vs 1153
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3020 vs 2177
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2590 vs 1153
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3020 vs 2177

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7540D IGP

  • Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 129 vs 120
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 129 vs 120

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 910M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7540D IGP

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
590
332
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
120
129
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
2629
1061
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2590
1153
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3020
2177
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2590
1153
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3020
2177
Name NVIDIA GeForce 910M AMD Radeon HD 7540D IGP
PassMark - G3D Mark 590 332
PassMark - G2D Mark 120 129
Geekbench - OpenCL 2629 1061
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 6.448
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 155.993
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.574
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 12.2
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 27.733
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1344
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2590 1153
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3020 2177
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1344
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2590 1153
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3020 2177

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce 910M AMD Radeon HD 7540D IGP

Essentials

Architecture Fermi 2.0 TeraScale 3
Code name GF117 Scrapper
Launch date 18 August 2015 2 October 2012
Place in performance rating 1379 1382
Type Laptop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $67

Technical info

Core clock speed 775 MHz 760 MHz
Floating-point performance 297.6 gflops 291.8 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 32 nm
Pipelines 384 192
Texture fill rate 12.4 GTexel / s 9.12 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 33 Watt 65 Watt
Transistor count 585 million 1,303 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCI Express 3.0
Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 IGP
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 11.2 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.5 4.4

Memory

Memory bandwidth 14.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz
Memory type DDR3 System Shared
Shared memory 0

Technologies

CUDA
GameWorks
GPU Boost
Optimus