NVIDIA GeForce 910M versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce 910M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 910M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 8 mois plus tard
- 4x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 96
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 601 versus 560
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 2629 versus 2498
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.448 versus 2.692
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.574 versus 0.55
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 12.2 versus 11.858
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 27.733 versus 17.753
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1344 versus 1263
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2590 versus 2479
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1344 versus 1263
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2590 versus 2479
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 18 August 2015 versus 27 November 2013 |
| Pipelines | 384 versus 96 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 601 versus 560 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2629 versus 2498 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.448 versus 2.692 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.574 versus 0.55 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.2 versus 11.858 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 27.733 versus 17.753 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1344 versus 1263 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2590 versus 2479 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1344 versus 1263 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2590 versus 2479 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M
- 2.2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 33 Watt
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 147 versus 128
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 161.29 versus 155.993
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3327 versus 3020
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3327 versus 3020
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 33 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 147 versus 128 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 161.29 versus 155.993 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3327 versus 3020 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3327 versus 3020 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 910M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce 910M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 601 | 560 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 128 | 147 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2629 | 2498 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.448 | 2.692 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 155.993 | 161.29 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.574 | 0.55 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.2 | 11.858 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 27.733 | 17.753 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1344 | 1263 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2590 | 2479 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3020 | 3327 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1344 | 1263 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2590 | 2479 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3020 | 3327 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce 910M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Nom de code | GF117 | GF117 |
| Date de sortie | 18 August 2015 | 27 November 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1366 | 1369 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 775 MHz | 775 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 297.6 gflops | 297.6 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 96 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 12.4 GTexel / s | 12.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 585 million | 585 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce 910M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce 910M vs
ATIRadeon IGP 340M
NVIDIAGeForce 910M vs
ATIRadeon IGP 320M
NVIDIAGeForce 910M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 820M
NVIDIAGeForce 910M vs
AMDRadeon R5 M255
NVIDIAGeForce 910M vs
IntelHD Graphics
NVIDIAGeForce 910M vs
AMDRadeon R6 M435DX
