NVIDIA GeForce 920M vs Intel HD Graphics 4400

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 920M and Intel HD Graphics 4400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 920M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• 2.7x more core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 350 MHz
• 2.7x more texture fill rate: 12.4 GTexel / s vs 4.6 GTexel / s
• 19.2x more pipelines: 384 vs 20
• 6.5x better floating-point performance: 297.6 gflops vs 46 gflops
• Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 716 vs 524
• Around 74% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3722 vs 2143
• Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.358 vs 7.844
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 157.606 vs 154.696
• Around 69% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 15.374 vs 9.084
• 4.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 40.443 vs 8.335
• Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1598 vs 817
• 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3636 vs 1381
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3044
• Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1598 vs 817
• 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3636 vs 1381
• Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3044
• 2.1x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 326 vs 152

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4400

• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 65% lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 33 Watt
• 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 275 vs 119
• Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.958 vs 0.843

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 920M
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4400

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	716 524
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	119 275
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3722 2143
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.358 7.844
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	157.606 154.696
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.843 0.958
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15.374 9.084
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	40.443 8.335
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1598 817
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3636 1381
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3044
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1598 817
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3636 1381
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3044
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	326 152

Compare specifications (specs)