NVIDIA GeForce 920M vs NVIDIA GeForce 610M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 920M and NVIDIA GeForce 610M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 920M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 42% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 672 MHz
• 8x more pipelines: 384 vs 48
• 2.3x better floating-point performance: 297.6 gflops vs 129.02 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
• 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 716 vs 292
• Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 119 vs 113
• 2.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3722 vs 1396
• 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.358 vs 2.747
• Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 157.606 vs 104.498
• 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.843 vs 0.27
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 15.374 vs 5.832
• 4.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 40.443 vs 9.69
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1598 vs 664
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3636 vs 1602
• Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 2848
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1598 vs 664
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3636 vs 1602
• Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 2848

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 610M

• 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 12 Watt vs 33 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 920M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 610M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	716 292
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	119 113
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3722 1396
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.358 2.747
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	157.606 104.498
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.843 0.27
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15.374 5.832
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	40.443 9.69
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1598 664
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3636 1602
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 2848
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1598 664
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3636 1602
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 2848

Compare specifications (specs)