NVIDIA GeForce 920M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 920M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 920M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• Around 42% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 672 MHz
• Around 15% higher texture fill rate: 12.4 GTexel / s vs 10.8 billion / sec
• 4x more pipelines: 384 vs 96
• Around 15% better floating-point performance: 297.6 gflops vs 258.05 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 6% lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 35 Watt
• 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
• 2x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 900 MHz
• Around 50% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 716 vs 478
• Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 119 vs 91
• Around 71% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3722 vs 2171
• Around 72% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.358 vs 4.85
• Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.843 vs 0.561
• Around 69% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 15.374 vs 9.109
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 40.443 vs 16.727
• Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1598 vs 960
• Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3636 vs 2210
• Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 2701
• Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1598 vs 960
• Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3636 vs 2210
• Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 2701

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M

• Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 195.796 vs 157.606

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 920M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	716 478
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	119 91
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3722 2171
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.358 4.85
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	157.606 195.796
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.843 0.561
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15.374 9.109
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	40.443 16.727
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1598 960
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3636 2210
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 2701
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1598 960
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3636 2210
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 2701

Compare specifications (specs)