NVIDIA GeForce 920M versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce 920M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 920M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 18% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 954 MHz versus 810 MHz
- Environ 36% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 33 Watt versus 45 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1598 versus 1589
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3636 versus 3235
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 versus 3339
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1598 versus 1589
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3636 versus 3235
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 versus 3339
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 13 March 2015 versus 1 April 2013 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 954 MHz versus 810 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt versus 45 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 157.606 versus 157.479 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1598 versus 1589 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3636 versus 3235 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3339 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1598 versus 1589 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3636 versus 3235 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3339 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
- Environ 26% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 15.68 GTexel / s versus 12.4 GTexel / s
- 2.5x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 752.6 gflops versus 297.6 gflops
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 798 versus 719
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 149 versus 118
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 3876 versus 3709
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 9.392 versus 8.358
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.864 versus 0.843
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 16.101 versus 15.374
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 44.77 versus 40.443
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 345 versus 326
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 15.68 GTexel / s versus 12.4 GTexel / s |
| Performance á point flottant | 752.6 gflops versus 297.6 gflops |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1802 MHz versus 1800 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 798 versus 719 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 149 versus 118 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3876 versus 3709 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.392 versus 8.358 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.864 versus 0.843 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 16.101 versus 15.374 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 44.77 versus 40.443 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 345 versus 326 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 920M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce 920M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 719 | 798 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 118 | 149 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3709 | 3876 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.358 | 9.392 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 157.606 | 157.479 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.843 | 0.864 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.374 | 16.101 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 40.443 | 44.77 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1598 | 1589 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3636 | 3235 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3339 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1598 | 1589 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3636 | 3235 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3339 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 326 | 345 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce 920M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | GK208B | GK107 |
| Date de sortie | 13 March 2015 | 1 April 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1309 | 1312 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 954 MHz | 810 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 297.6 gflops | 752.6 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 12.4 GTexel / s | 15.68 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 585 million | 1,270 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 980 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 1802 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | DDR3 / GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
| Verde Drivers | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce 920M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce 920M vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 2400
NVIDIAGeForce 920M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 740M
NVIDIAGeForce 920M vs
AMDRadeon R5 230
NVIDIAGeForce 920M vs
AMDRadeon R5 M240
NVIDIAGeForce 920M vs
AMDRadeon R7 M445
NVIDIAGeForce 920M vs
AMDRadeon R5 M435
