NVIDIA GeForce 920M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 920M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 920M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• Around 1% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 941 MHz
• Around 52% lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 50 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 15.374 vs 10.872
• 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 40.443 vs 13.423
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3636 vs 3520
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3334
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3636 vs 3520
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3334

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M

• 2.5x more texture fill rate: 30.94 GTexel / s vs 12.4 GTexel / s
• 2.5x better floating-point performance: 742.7 gflops vs 297.6 gflops
• 2.2x more memory clock speed: 4012 MHz vs 1800 MHz
• Around 86% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1330 vs 716
• 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 244 vs 119
• Around 15% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4267 vs 3722
• Around 87% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.67 vs 8.358
• Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 251.09 vs 157.606
• Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.144 vs 0.843
• Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2351 vs 1598
• Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2351 vs 1598
• Around 41% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 461 vs 326

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 920M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	716 1330
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	119 244
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3722 4267
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.358 15.67
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	157.606 251.09
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.843 1.144
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15.374 10.872
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	40.443 13.423
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1598 2351
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3636 3520
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3334
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1598 2351
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3636 3520
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3334
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	326 461

Compare specifications (specs)