NVIDIA GeForce 920M versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce 920M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 920M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 1% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 954 MHz versus 941 MHz
- Environ 52% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 33 Watt versus 50 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 15.374 versus 10.872
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 40.443 versus 13.423
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3636 versus 3520
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 versus 3334
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3636 versus 3520
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 versus 3334
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 13 March 2015 versus 9 January 2013 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 954 MHz versus 941 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt versus 50 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.374 versus 10.872 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 40.443 versus 13.423 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3636 versus 3520 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3334 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3636 versus 3520 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3334 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 30.94 GTexel / s versus 12.4 GTexel / s
- 2.5x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 742.7 gflops versus 297.6 gflops
- 2.2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4012 MHz versus 1800 MHz
- Environ 86% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1330 versus 716
- 2.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 244 versus 119
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4267 versus 3722
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.67 versus 8.358
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 251.09 versus 157.606
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.144 versus 0.843
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2351 versus 1598
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2351 versus 1598
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 461 versus 326
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 30.94 GTexel / s versus 12.4 GTexel / s |
| Performance á point flottant | 742.7 gflops versus 297.6 gflops |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4012 MHz versus 1800 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1330 versus 716 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 244 versus 119 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4267 versus 3722 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.67 versus 8.358 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 251.09 versus 157.606 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.144 versus 0.843 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2351 versus 1598 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2351 versus 1598 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 461 versus 326 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 920M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce 920M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 716 | 1330 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 119 | 244 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3722 | 4267 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.358 | 15.67 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 157.606 | 251.09 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.843 | 1.144 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.374 | 10.872 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 40.443 | 13.423 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1598 | 2351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3636 | 3520 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3334 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1598 | 2351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3636 | 3520 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3334 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 326 | 461 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce 920M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | GK208B | GK107 |
| Date de sortie | 13 March 2015 | 9 January 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1297 | 1141 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 954 MHz | 941 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 297.6 gflops | 742.7 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 12.4 GTexel / s | 30.94 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 585 million | 1,270 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 967 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | 64.19 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 4012 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | DDR3 / GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
| Verde Drivers | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce 920M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce 920M vs
ATIRadeon 9000
NVIDIAGeForce 920M vs
NVIDIAQuadro K610M
NVIDIAGeForce 920M vs
AMDRadeon R5 235 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce 920M vs
AMDRadeon R5 M240
NVIDIAGeForce 920M vs
AMDRadeon R7 M445
NVIDIAGeForce 920M vs
AMDRadeon R5 M435
