NVIDIA GeForce 920M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 920M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 920M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• Around 12% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 850 MHz
• 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 75 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3636 vs 3275
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3333
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3636 vs 3275
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3333

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M

• 4.5x more texture fill rate: 55.23 GTexel / s vs 12.4 GTexel / s
• 2x more pipelines: 768 vs 384
• 4.5x better floating-point performance: 1,326 gflops vs 297.6 gflops
• Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
• 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2014 vs 716
• 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 291 vs 119
• Around 95% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7252 vs 3722
• Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.832 vs 8.358
• 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 520.747 vs 157.606
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.935 vs 0.843
• Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.952 vs 15.374
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 43.535 vs 40.443
• Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3188 vs 1598
• Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3188 vs 1598
• 2.3x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 759 vs 326

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 920M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	716 2014
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	119 291
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3722 7252
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.358 8.832
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	157.606 520.747
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.843 0.935
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15.374 19.952
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	40.443 43.535
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1598 3188
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3636 3275
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3333
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1598 3188
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3636 3275
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3333
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	326 759

Compare specifications (specs)