NVIDIA GeForce 920M versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce 920M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 920M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 12% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 954 MHz versus 850 MHz
- 2.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 33 Watt versus 75 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3636 versus 3275
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 versus 3333
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3636 versus 3275
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 versus 3333
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 13 March 2015 versus 30 May 2013 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 954 MHz versus 850 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt versus 75 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3636 versus 3275 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3636 versus 3275 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3333 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 55.23 GTexel / s versus 12.4 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 768 versus 384
- 4.5x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,326 gflops versus 297.6 gflops
- Environ 11% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 2000 MHz versus 1800 MHz
- 2.8x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2014 versus 716
- 2.4x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 291 versus 119
- Environ 95% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 7252 versus 3722
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.832 versus 8.358
- 3.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 520.747 versus 157.606
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.935 versus 0.843
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.952 versus 15.374
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 43.535 versus 40.443
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3188 versus 1598
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3188 versus 1598
- 2.3x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 759 versus 326
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 55.23 GTexel / s versus 12.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 768 versus 384 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,326 gflops versus 297.6 gflops |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz versus 1800 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2014 versus 716 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 291 versus 119 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7252 versus 3722 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.832 versus 8.358 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 520.747 versus 157.606 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.935 versus 0.843 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.952 versus 15.374 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 43.535 versus 40.443 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3188 versus 1598 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3188 versus 1598 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 759 versus 326 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 920M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce 920M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 716 | 2014 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 119 | 291 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3722 | 7252 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.358 | 8.832 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 157.606 | 520.747 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.843 | 0.935 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.374 | 19.952 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 40.443 | 43.535 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1598 | 3188 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3636 | 3275 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1598 | 3188 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3636 | 3275 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3333 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 326 | 759 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce 920M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | GK208B | GK106 |
| Date de sortie | 13 March 2015 | 30 May 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1297 | 1005 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 954 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 297.6 gflops | 1,326 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 768 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 12.4 GTexel / s | 55.23 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 585 million | 2,540 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 863 MHz | |
| Noyaux CUDA | 768 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Options SLI | 1 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | 64.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
| Verde Drivers | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce 920M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce 920M vs
ATIRadeon 9000
NVIDIAGeForce 920M vs
NVIDIAQuadro K610M
NVIDIAGeForce 920M vs
AMDRadeon R5 235 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce 920M vs
AMDRadeon R5 M240
NVIDIAGeForce 920M vs
AMDRadeon R7 M445
NVIDIAGeForce 920M vs
AMDRadeon R5 M435
