NVIDIA GeForce 920M vs NVIDIA NVS 5200M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 920M and NVIDIA NVS 5200M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 920M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 42% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 672 MHz
• Around 15% higher texture fill rate: 12.4 GTexel / s vs 10.75 GTexel / s
• 4x more pipelines: 384 vs 96
• Around 15% better floating-point performance: 297.6 gflops vs 258.0 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 716 vs 507
• Around 75% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3722 vs 2130
• Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.358 vs 5.829
• Around 56% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.843 vs 0.539
• Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 15.374 vs 9.643
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 40.443 vs 16.851
• 7.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1598 vs 222
• 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3636 vs 1099
• Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 2715
• 7.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1598 vs 222
• 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3636 vs 1099
• Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 2715

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 5200M

• Around 32% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 33 Watt
• Around 74% higher memory clock speed: 3140 MHz vs 1800 MHz
• Around 58% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 188 vs 119
• Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 189.966 vs 157.606

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 920M
GPU 2: NVIDIA NVS 5200M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	716 507
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	119 188
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3722 2130
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.358 5.829
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	157.606 189.966
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.843 0.539
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15.374 9.643
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	40.443 16.851
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1598 222
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3636 1099
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 2715
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1598 222
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3636 1099
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 2715

Compare specifications (specs)