NVIDIA GeForce 920MX vs AMD Radeon E8860
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 920MX and AMD Radeon E8860 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 920MX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 68% higher core clock speed: 965 MHz vs 575 MHz
- Around 59% higher boost clock speed: 993 MHz vs 625 MHz
- Around 13% higher texture fill rate: 28.22 GTexel / s vs 25 GTexel / s
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 16 Watt vs 37 Watt
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1764 vs 1246
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3691 vs 1655
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1764 vs 1246
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3691 vs 1655
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 25 March 2016 vs 25 January 2014 |
Core clock speed | 965 MHz vs 575 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 993 MHz vs 625 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 28.22 GTexel / s vs 25 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 16 Watt vs 37 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1764 vs 1246 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3691 vs 1655 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1764 vs 1246 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 vs 1655 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E8860
- 2.5x more pipelines: 640 vs 256
- Around 33% better floating-point performance: 800.0 gflops vs 602.1 gflops
- 2.5x more memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- Around 57% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1686 vs 1073
- 2.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 436 vs 149
- 6.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 26300 vs 3951
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4345 vs 3358
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4345 vs 3358
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 640 vs 256 |
Floating-point performance | 800.0 gflops vs 602.1 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1686 vs 1073 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 436 vs 149 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 26300 vs 3951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4345 vs 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4345 vs 3358 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 920MX
GPU 2: AMD Radeon E8860
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 920MX | AMD Radeon E8860 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1073 | 1686 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 149 | 436 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3951 | 26300 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1764 | 1246 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3691 | 1655 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 4345 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1764 | 1246 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 | 1655 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 4345 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 385 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.395 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 529.248 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.683 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.803 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 47.86 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 920MX | AMD Radeon E8860 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GM108 | Venus |
Launch date | 25 March 2016 | 25 January 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 1027 | 1029 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 993 MHz | 625 MHz |
Core clock speed | 965 MHz | 575 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 602.1 gflops | 800.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 256 | 640 |
Texture fill rate | 28.22 GTexel / s | 25 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 16 Watt | 37 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 72 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 4500 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus | ||
Verde Drivers |