NVIDIA GeForce 920MX vs AMD Radeon E8860

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 920MX and AMD Radeon E8860 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 920MX

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
  • Around 68% higher core clock speed: 965 MHz vs 575 MHz
  • Around 59% higher boost clock speed: 993 MHz vs 625 MHz
  • Around 13% higher texture fill rate: 28.22 GTexel / s vs 25 GTexel / s
  • 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 16 Watt vs 37 Watt
  • Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1764 vs 1246
  • 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3691 vs 1655
  • Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1764 vs 1246
  • 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3691 vs 1655
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 25 March 2016 vs 25 January 2014
Core clock speed 965 MHz vs 575 MHz
Boost clock speed 993 MHz vs 625 MHz
Texture fill rate 28.22 GTexel / s vs 25 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 16 Watt vs 37 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1764 vs 1246
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3691 vs 1655
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1764 vs 1246
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3691 vs 1655

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E8860

  • 2.5x more pipelines: 640 vs 256
  • Around 33% better floating-point performance: 800.0 gflops vs 602.1 gflops
  • 2.5x more memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 1800 MHz
  • Around 57% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1686 vs 1073
  • 2.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 436 vs 149
  • 6.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 26300 vs 3951
  • Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4345 vs 3358
  • Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4345 vs 3358
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 640 vs 256
Floating-point performance 800.0 gflops vs 602.1 gflops
Memory clock speed 4500 MHz vs 1800 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1686 vs 1073
PassMark - G2D Mark 436 vs 149
Geekbench - OpenCL 26300 vs 3951
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 4345 vs 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 4345 vs 3358

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 920MX
GPU 2: AMD Radeon E8860

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1073
1686
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
149
436
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
3951
26300
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1764
1246
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3691
1655
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3358
4345
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1764
1246
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3691
1655
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3358
4345
Name NVIDIA GeForce 920MX AMD Radeon E8860
PassMark - G3D Mark 1073 1686
PassMark - G2D Mark 149 436
Geekbench - OpenCL 3951 26300
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1764 1246
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3691 1655
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3358 4345
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1764 1246
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3691 1655
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3358 4345
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 385
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 20.395
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 529.248
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.683
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 15.803
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 47.86

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce 920MX AMD Radeon E8860

Essentials

Architecture Maxwell GCN 1.0
Code name GM108 Venus
Launch date 25 March 2016 25 January 2014
Place in performance rating 1027 1029
Type Laptop Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 993 MHz 625 MHz
Core clock speed 965 MHz 575 MHz
Floating-point performance 602.1 gflops 800.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 256 640
Texture fill rate 28.22 GTexel / s 25 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 16 Watt 37 Watt
Transistor count 1,500 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 4x mini-DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCI Express 3.0
Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL 4.5 4.5

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 14.4 GB / s 72 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz 4500 MHz
Memory type DDR3, GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
CUDA
GameWorks
GPU Boost
Optimus
Verde Drivers