NVIDIA GeForce 930MX vs AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 930MX and AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 930MX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- Around 6% higher core clock speed: 952 MHz vs 900 MHz
- 3.8x lower typical power consumption: 17 Watt vs 65 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 2% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5494 vs 5412
- Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2053 vs 1106
- Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3577 vs 1841
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3260
- Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2053 vs 1106
- Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3577 vs 1841
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3260
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 March 2016 vs 5 May 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 952 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 17 Watt vs 65 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5494 vs 5412 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2053 vs 1106 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3577 vs 1841 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3260 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2053 vs 1106 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3577 vs 1841 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3260 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM
- Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 1020 MHz
- Around 3% higher texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel / s vs 24.48 GTexel / s
- Around 3% better floating-point performance: 806.4 gflops vs 783.4 gflops
- 2.2x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 1020 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s vs 24.48 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 806.4 gflops vs 783.4 gflops |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 930MX
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce 930MX | AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1293 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 195 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5494 | 5412 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.565 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 165.338 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.09 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2053 | 1106 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3577 | 1841 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3260 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2053 | 1106 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3577 | 1841 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3260 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 495 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce 930MX | AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GM108 | Oland |
| Launch date | 1 March 2016 | 5 May 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 1115 | 1287 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1020 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 952 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 783.4 gflops | 806.4 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Texture fill rate | 24.48 GTexel / s | 25.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 17 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 72 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce 930MX with others
NVIDIAGeForce 930MX vs
AMDRadeon R5 M315
NVIDIAGeForce 930MX vs
AMDRadeon R5 330 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce 930MX vs
AMDFirePro W5130M
NVIDIAGeForce 930MX vs
AMDRadeon R7 M440
NVIDIAGeForce 930MX vs
AMDRadeon R5 M420
NVIDIAGeForce 930MX vs
AMDRadeon 530
