NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX vs ATI All-In-Wonder 9000 PRO
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX and ATI All-In-Wonder 9000 PRO videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 82% higher core clock speed: 500 MHz vs 275 MHz
- 25.5x more texture fill rate: 28 GTexel / s vs 1.1 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 150 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 128 MB
- 3.6x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 450 MHz
- 90.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 454 vs 5
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 July 2008 vs 31 March 2003 |
Core clock speed | 500 MHz vs 275 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 28 GTexel / s vs 1.1 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 150 nm |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 128 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 450 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 454 vs 5 |
Reasons to consider the ATI All-In-Wonder 9000 PRO
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 103 vs 89
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 103 vs 89 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX
GPU 2: ATI All-In-Wonder 9000 PRO
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX | ATI All-In-Wonder 9000 PRO |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 454 | 5 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 89 | 103 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX | ATI All-In-Wonder 9000 PRO | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Rage 7 |
Code name | G92 | RV250 |
Launch date | 15 July 2008 | 31 March 2003 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $328.50 | |
Place in performance rating | 1353 | 1355 |
Price now | $328.50 | |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 2.78 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 275 MHz |
CUDA cores per GPU | 112 | |
Floating-point performance | 280 gflops | |
Gigaflops | 420 | |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 150 nm |
Pipelines | 112 | |
Texture fill rate | 28 GTexel / s | 1.1 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Transistor count | 754 million | 36 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | AGP 8x |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 8.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 1.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB / s | 7.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 450 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
PureVideo HD | ||
SLI |