NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 47% higher texture fill rate: 12.96 GTexel / s vs 8.8 billion / sec
- 2.3x more pipelines: 72 vs 32
- 2.1x better floating-point performance: 187.49 gflops vs 89.6 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
- Around 16% lower typical power consumption: 43 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 256 / 512 MB
- Around 98% higher memory clock speed: 1580 MHz vs 800 (GDDR3) and 500 (DDR2) MHz
- Around 84% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 59 vs 32
- 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 470 vs 172
- Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2502 vs 1505
- Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2502 vs 1505
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 February 2010 vs 29 July 2008 |
Texture fill rate | 12.96 GTexel / s vs 8.8 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 72 vs 32 |
Floating-point performance | 187.49 gflops vs 89.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 43 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 256 / 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1580 MHz vs 800 (GDDR3) and 500 (DDR2) MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 59 vs 32 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 470 vs 172 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2502 vs 1505 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2502 vs 1505 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT
- 2.6x more core clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 540 MHz
Core clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 540 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 59 | 32 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 470 | 172 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8132 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2502 | 1505 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2502 | 1505 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.612 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 56.838 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | GT215 | G96C |
Launch date | 2 February 2010 | 29 July 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1482 | 1666 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $85.99 | |
Price now | $85.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 4.13 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 540 MHz | 1400 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 187.49 gflops | 89.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 72 | 32 |
Texture fill rate | 12.96 GTexel / s | 8.8 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 43 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 727 million | 314 million |
CUDA cores | 32 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, Dual Link DVISingle Link DVI |
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 175 mm | 6.875" (17.5 cm) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 256 / 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 25.28 GB / s | 25.6 (GDDR3) and 16.0 (DDR2) |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1580 MHz | 800 (GDDR3) and 500 (DDR2) MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
SLI |