NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 240
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 45% higher texture fill rate: 25.5 GTexel / s vs 17.6 GTexel / s
- 4x more pipelines: 384 vs 96
- 2.4x better floating-point performance: 612.1 gflops vs 257.28 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 38% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 69 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB or 1 GB
- Around 5% higher memory clock speed: 1782 MHz vs 1700 MHz GDDR5, 1000 MHz GDDR3, 900 MHz DDR3 MHz
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2167 vs 1979
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3334 vs 1385
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2167 vs 1979
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3334 vs 1385
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 24 April 2012 vs 17 November 2009 |
| Texture fill rate | 25.5 GTexel / s vs 17.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 96 |
| Floating-point performance | 612.1 gflops vs 257.28 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 69 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 512 MB or 1 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz vs 1700 MHz GDDR5, 1000 MHz GDDR3, 900 MHz DDR3 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2167 vs 1979 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3334 vs 1385 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2167 vs 1979 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3334 vs 1385 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 240
- Around 68% higher core clock speed: 1340 MHz vs 797 MHz
| Core clock speed | 1340 MHz vs 797 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 240
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.932 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 254.345 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.14 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.613 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 15.32 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1502 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2167 | 1979 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3334 | 1385 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1502 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2167 | 1979 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3334 | 1385 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 504 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 48 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9236 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | GK107 | GT215 |
| Launch date | 24 April 2012 | 17 November 2009 |
| Place in performance rating | 1386 | 1390 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $80 | |
| Price now | $37.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 22.27 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 797 MHz | 1340 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 612.1 gflops | 257.28 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 96 |
| Texture fill rate | 25.5 GTexel / s | 17.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 69 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 727 million |
| CUDA cores | 96 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105C C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | DVIVGAHDMI, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 145 mm | 6.6" (168mm) (16.8 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.2 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB or 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB / s | 54.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | 1700 MHz GDDR5, 1000 MHz GDDR3, 900 MHz DDR3 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM with others
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 OEM vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5750
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 415M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 OEM vs
ATIRadeon HD 5570
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 OEM vs
AMDRadeon HD 7540D IGP
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 OEM vs
AMDRadeon R7 M270
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 OEM vs
IntelUHD Graphics 620
