NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 384 vs 240
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 4.9x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 219 Watt
- Around 14% higher maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 896 MB
- Around 59% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1134 MHz
- 3.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 235 vs 73
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 22 March 2012 vs 15 January 2009 |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 240 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 219 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 896 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1134 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 235 vs 73 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275
- Around 3% better floating-point performance: 673.9 gflops vs 652.8 gflops
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1409 vs 1206
- 6.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 23256 vs 3800
- Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3195 vs 1913
- Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3195 vs 1913
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Floating-point performance | 673.9 gflops vs 652.8 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1409 vs 1206 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 23256 vs 3800 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3195 vs 1913 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3195 vs 1913 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1206 | 1409 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 235 | 73 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3800 | 23256 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.947 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 340.824 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.982 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.773 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.111 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2283 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3299 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1913 | 3195 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2283 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3299 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1913 | 3195 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 414 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | GK107 | GT200B |
| Launch date | 22 March 2012 | 15 January 2009 |
| Place in performance rating | 1216 | 1219 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $249 | |
| Price now | $119.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 13.43 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 950 MHz | |
| CUDA cores | 384 | 240 |
| Floating-point performance | 652.8 gflops | 673.9 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 240 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 219 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 1,400 million |
| Core clock speed | 1404 MHz | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
| Texture fill rate | 50.6 billion / sec | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | Two Dual Link DVI, 2x DVI |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | PCI-E 2.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| SLI options | 2-way3-way | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 10.0 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.0 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 896 MB |
| Memory bus width | 128bit | 448 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1134 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3\GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
| Memory bandwidth | 127.0 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectCompute | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M with others
NVIDIAGeForce GT 650M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 275
NVIDIAGeForce GT 650M vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5870
NVIDIAGeForce GT 650M vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4250 IGP
NVIDIAGeForce GT 650M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 645M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 650M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 625M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 650M vs
NVIDIAQuadro K2000
