NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M and NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 8 month(s) later
  • Around 57% higher core clock speed: 941 MHz vs 600 MHz
  • Around 50% higher pipelines: 384 vs 2x 128
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
  • 4.5x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 226 Watt
  • 2.5x more memory clock speed: 4012 MHz vs 1600 MHz
  • Around 97% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1330 vs 676
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 9 January 2013 vs 18 April 2008
Core clock speed 941 MHz vs 600 MHz
Pipelines 384 vs 2x 128
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 65 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt vs 226 Watt
Memory clock speed 4012 MHz vs 1600 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1330 vs 676

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2

  • 7.7x more texture fill rate: 2x 38.4 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 30.94 GTexel / s
  • Around 3% better floating-point performance: 2x 384.0 gflops vs 742.7 gflops
  • 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 509 vs 244
  • Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4196 vs 3334
  • Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4196 vs 3334
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 2x 38.4 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 30.94 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance 2x 384.0 gflops vs 742.7 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 509 vs 244
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 4196 vs 3334
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 4196 vs 3334

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1330
676
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
244
509
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3334
4196
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3334
4196
Name NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2
PassMark - G3D Mark 1330 676
PassMark - G2D Mark 244 509
Geekbench - OpenCL 4267
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 15.67
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 251.09
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.144
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 10.872
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 13.423
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2351
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3520
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3334 4196
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2351
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3520
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3334 4196
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 461

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2

Essentials

Architecture Kepler Tesla
Code name GK107 G92
Launch date 9 January 2013 18 April 2008
Place in performance rating 1141 490
Type Laptop Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $2,999

Technical info

Boost clock speed 967 MHz
Core clock speed 941 MHz 600 MHz
Floating-point performance 742.7 gflops 2x 384.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 65 nm
Pipelines 384 2x 128
Texture fill rate 30.94 GTexel / s 2x 38.4 GTexel / s billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt 226 Watt
Transistor count 1,270 million 754 million

Video outputs and ports

7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
Display Connectors No outputs 2x DVI, 1x S-Video
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support Up to 3840x2160
eDP 1.2 signal support Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
HDMI
LVDS signal support Up to 1920x1200
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
VGA аnalog display support Up to 2048x1536

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCI Express 3.0
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size medium sized
Length 267 mm
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

API support

DirectX 12 API 10.0
OpenCL 1.1
OpenGL 4.5 3.3

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 2x 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 64.19 GB / s 2x 51.2 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 2x 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 4012 MHz 1600 MHz
Memory type DDR3, GDDR5 GDDR3
Shared memory 0
Standard memory configuration DDR3 / GDDR5

Technologies

3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
Blu-Ray 3D Support
CUDA
Direct Compute
FXAA
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus