NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M vs ATI Radeon HD 5730
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M and ATI Radeon HD 5730 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 26% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 775 MHz
- 2x more texture fill rate: 31.36 GTexel / s vs 15.5 GTexel / s
- Around 21% better floating-point performance: 752.6 gflops vs 620.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 28% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 64 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 35% higher memory clock speed: 5400 MHz vs 4000 MHz
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3504 vs 2484
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3504 vs 2484
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 25 June 2013 vs 26 February 2011 |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz vs 775 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 31.36 GTexel / s vs 15.5 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 752.6 gflops vs 620.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 64 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 5400 MHz vs 4000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3504 vs 2484 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3504 vs 2484 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5730
- Around 4% higher pipelines: 400 vs 384
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 400 vs 384 |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3345 vs 3344 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3345 vs 3344 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5730
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M | ATI Radeon HD 5730 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1713 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 333 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4928 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.449 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 455.796 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.295 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.566 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 28.025 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3093 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3504 | 2484 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 | 3345 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3093 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3504 | 2484 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 | 3345 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2148 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M | ATI Radeon HD 5730 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | GK107 | Redwood |
| Launch date | 25 June 2013 | 26 February 2011 |
| Place in performance rating | 934 | 937 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz | 775 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 752.6 gflops | 620.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 400 |
| Texture fill rate | 31.36 GTexel / s | 15.5 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 64 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 627 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | ||
| HDMI | ||
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Length | 168 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 86.4 GB / s | 64.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5400 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M with others
NVIDIAGeForce GT 755M vs
ATIRadeon HD 5730
NVIDIAGeForce GT 755M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 SE
NVIDIAGeForce GT 755M vs
AMDFirePro M4000
NVIDIAGeForce GT 755M vs
AMDRadeon R7 M370
NVIDIAGeForce GT 755M vs
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Embedded
NVIDIAGeForce GT 755M vs
AMDRadeon Vega 8 Efficient
