NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• Around 33% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 736 MHz
• Around 33% higher pipelines: 384 vs 288
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 3x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 150 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 41% higher memory clock speed: 5400 MHz vs 3828 MHz
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3093 vs 2970
• Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3504 vs 3114
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3093 vs 2970
• Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3504 vs 3114

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE

• Around 13% higher texture fill rate: 35.33 GTexel / s vs 31.36 GTexel / s
• Around 13% better floating-point performance: 847.9 gflops vs 752.6 gflops
• Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1851 vs 1713
• Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 467 vs 333
• Around 43% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7032 vs 4928
• Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.456 vs 12.449
• Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 618.773 vs 455.796
• Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.693 vs 1.295
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 27.232 vs 24.566
• Around 79% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 50.114 vs 28.025

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1713 1851
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	333 467
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4928 7032
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12.449 18.456
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	455.796 618.773
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.295 1.693
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	24.566 27.232
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	28.025 50.114
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3093 2970
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3504 3114
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3344 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3093 2970
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3504 3114
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3344 3356

Compare specifications (specs)