NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M versus AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M and AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M
- Environ 94% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 775 MHz versus 400 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 12.4 GTexel / s versus 3.2 GTexel / s
- 2.9x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 297.6 gflops versus 102.4 gflops
- Environ 67% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 25 Watt
- 2.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 560 versus 265
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 147 versus 78
- 2.1x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 2498 versus 1211
- 2.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2479 versus 930
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3327 versus 1631
- 2.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2479 versus 930
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3327 versus 1631
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 775 MHz versus 400 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 12.4 GTexel / s versus 3.2 GTexel / s |
Performance á point flottant | 297.6 gflops versus 102.4 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 25 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 560 versus 265 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 147 versus 78 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2498 versus 1211 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2479 versus 930 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3327 versus 1631 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2479 versus 930 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3327 versus 1631 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP
- Environ 33% de pipelines plus haut: 128 versus 96
- 6.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.197 versus 2.692
- 8.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1322.192 versus 161.29
- 3.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.774 versus 0.55
- 4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 47.241 versus 11.858
- 12.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 224.569 versus 17.753
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 128 versus 96 |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.197 versus 2.692 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1322.192 versus 161.29 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.774 versus 0.55 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 47.241 versus 11.858 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 224.569 versus 17.753 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M | AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 560 | 265 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 147 | 78 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2498 | 1211 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.692 | 18.197 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 161.29 | 1322.192 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.55 | 1.774 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.858 | 47.241 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 17.753 | 224.569 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1263 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2479 | 930 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3327 | 1631 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1263 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2479 | 930 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3327 | 1631 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M | AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Nom de code | GF117 | Kalindi |
Date de sortie | 27 November 2013 | 23 November 2013 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1369 | 1370 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 775 MHz | 400 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 297.6 gflops | 102.4 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | 128 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 12.4 GTexel / s | 3.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 25 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 585 million | 1,178 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | IGP |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | System Shared |