NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M vs ATI Radeon X800 GT

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M and ATI Radeon X800 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 4 month(s) later
  • 2.1x more core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 475 MHz
  • 3.4x more texture fill rate: 13 billion / sec vs 3.8 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 65 nm vs 110 nm
  • 8x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 128 MB
  • 6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 504 vs 84
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 3 March 2009 vs 1 November 2005
Core clock speed 1000 MHz vs 475 MHz
Texture fill rate 13 billion / sec vs 3.8 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 65 nm vs 110 nm
Maximum memory size 1 GB vs 128 MB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 504 vs 84

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon X800 GT

  • Around 13% lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 45 Watt
  • Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 423 vs 407
Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 40 Watt vs 45 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 423 vs 407

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon X800 GT

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
407
423
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
504
84
Name NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M ATI Radeon X800 GT
PassMark - G2D Mark 407 423
PassMark - G3D Mark 504 84

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150M ATI Radeon X800 GT

Essentials

Architecture Tesla R400
Code name G94 R430
Launch date 3 March 2009 1 November 2005
Place in performance rating 372 370
Type Laptop Desktop

Technical info

Core clock speed 1000 MHz 475 MHz
CUDA cores 64
Floating-point performance 128 gflops
Gigaflops 192
Manufacturing process technology 65 nm 110 nm
Pipelines 64
Texture fill rate 13 billion / sec 3.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 45 Watt 40 Watt
Transistor count 505 million 160 million

Video outputs and ports

Audio input for HDMI S / PDIF
Display Connectors DisplayPortHDMIDual Link DVILVDSSingle Link DVIVGA 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCI-E 2.0
Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 1.0 x16
Laptop size large
MXM Type MXM 3.0 Type-B
SLI options 2-way
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 10.0 9.0b
OpenGL 2.1 2.0

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 128 MB
Memory bandwidth 51 GB / s 31.55 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 Bit 256 Bit
Memory type GDDR3 DDR
Shared memory 0
Memory clock speed 986 MHz

Technologies

CUDA
MXM 3.0 Type-B
PCI-E 2.0
Power management 8.0
PowerMizer 8.0
PureVideo HD