NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) vs NVIDIA Quadro K620

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) and NVIDIA Quadro K620 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)

NVIDIA Quadro K620

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
Around 22% higher core clock speed: 1290 MHz vs 1058 MHz
Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 1124 MHz
3.2x more texture fill rate: 58.2 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s
Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
2.2x better floating-point performance: 1,862 gflops vs 863.2 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
3.9x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 1800 MHz
2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5029 vs 2220
2.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17466 vs 6869
3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 67.209 vs 22.112
2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 799.414 vs 297.631
3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.536 vs 1.427
Around 99% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.523 vs 15.363
2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 223.683 vs 99.125
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7043 vs 2970
Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3685 vs 2490
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 3329
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7043 vs 2970
Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3685 vs 2490
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 3329

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	25 October 2016 vs 22 July 2014
Core clock speed	1290 MHz vs 1058 MHz
Boost clock speed	1392 MHz vs 1124 MHz
Texture fill rate	58.2 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s
Pipelines	640 vs 384
Floating-point performance	1,862 gflops vs 863.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed	7008 MHz vs 1800 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	5029 vs 2220
Geekbench - OpenCL	17466 vs 6869
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	67.209 vs 22.112
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	799.414 vs 297.631
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	4.536 vs 1.427
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	30.523 vs 15.363
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	223.683 vs 99.125
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	7043 vs 2970
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3685 vs 2490
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3360 vs 3329
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	7043 vs 2970
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3685 vs 2490
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3360 vs 3329

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K620

Around 83% lower typical power consumption: 41 Watt vs 75 Watt
Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 480 vs 457
5.8x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 702 vs 122

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	41 Watt vs 75 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	480 vs 457
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	702 vs 122

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K620

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

5029

2220

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

457

480

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

17466

6869

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

67.209

22.112

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

799.414

297.631

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4.536

1.427

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

30.523

15.363

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

223.683

99.125

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7043

2970

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3685

2490

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3360

3329

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7043

2970

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3685

2490

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3360

3329

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

122

702

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)	NVIDIA Quadro K620
PassMark - G3D Mark	5029	2220
PassMark - G2D Mark	457	480
Geekbench - OpenCL	17466	6869
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	67.209	22.112
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	799.414	297.631
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	4.536	1.427
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	30.523	15.363
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	223.683	99.125
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	7043	2970
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3685	2490
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3360	3329
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	7043	2970
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3685	2490
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3360	3329
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	122	702

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)	NVIDIA Quadro K620
Essentials
Architecture	Pascal	Maxwell
Code name	GP107	GM107
Launch date	25 October 2016	22 July 2014
Launch price (MSRP)	$109	$189.89
Place in performance rating	586	953
Price now	$124.99	$189.93
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Value for money (0-100)	56.95	15.23
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1392 MHz	1124 MHz
Core clock speed	1290 MHz	1058 MHz
CUDA cores	640
Floating-point performance	1,862 gflops	863.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Maximum GPU temperature	97 °C
Pipelines	640	384
Texture fill rate	58.2 GTexel / s	17.98 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt	41 Watt
Transistor count	3,300 million	1,870 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, DP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI	1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, DVI-I DP
G-SYNC support
HDCP
Multi monitor support
Number of simultaneous displays		4
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bus support	PCIe 3.0
Height	4.38" (11.1 cm)
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	5.7" (14.5 cm)	160 mm
Recommended system power (PSU)	300 Watt
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Width	2-slot	1" (2.5 cm)
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Vulkan
Shader Model		5
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	112 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	7008 MHz	1800 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	128 Bit
Shared memory	0
Technologies
3D Vision
Ansel
CUDA
GameStream
GPU Boost
Multi Monitor
Multi-Projection
ShadowWorks
VR Ready
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Desktop Management