NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) versus NVIDIA Tesla C2050
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) and NVIDIA Tesla C2050 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 3 mois plus tard
- 2.2x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1290 MHz versus 575 MHz
- Environ 81% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 58.2 GTexel / s versus 32.2 GTexel / s
- Environ 43% de pipelines plus haut: 640 versus 448
- Environ 81% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,862 gflops versus 1,030.4 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 40 nm
- 3.2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 238 Watt
- Environ 33% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 4 GB versus 3 GB
- 2.3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 7008 MHz versus 3000 MHz
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 5050 versus 3176
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 464 versus 362
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 16812 versus 11024
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 67.209 versus 26.055
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.536 versus 2.99
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 223.683 versus 89.869
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 25 October 2016 versus 25 July 2011 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1290 MHz versus 575 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 58.2 GTexel / s versus 32.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 640 versus 448 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,862 gflops versus 1,030.4 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 238 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 3 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7008 MHz versus 3000 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5050 versus 3176 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 464 versus 362 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 16812 versus 11024 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.209 versus 26.055 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.536 versus 2.99 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 223.683 versus 89.869 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla C2050
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 901.157 versus 799.414
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 41.654 versus 30.523
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5962 versus 3685
- 2.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 9064 versus 3360
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5962 versus 3685
- 2.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 9064 versus 3360
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 901.157 versus 799.414 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 41.654 versus 30.523 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5962 versus 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 9064 versus 3360 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5962 versus 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 9064 versus 3360 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla C2050
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) | NVIDIA Tesla C2050 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5050 | 3176 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 464 | 362 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 16812 | 11024 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.209 | 26.055 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 799.414 | 901.157 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.536 | 2.99 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.523 | 41.654 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 223.683 | 89.869 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7043 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 | 5962 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 9064 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7043 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 | 5962 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 9064 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1756 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) | NVIDIA Tesla C2050 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Fermi |
| Nom de code | GP107 | GF100 |
| Date de sortie | 25 October 2016 | 25 July 2011 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $109 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 578 | 575 |
| Prix maintenant | $124.99 | |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 56.95 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1392 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1290 MHz | 575 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 640 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,862 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Température maximale du GPU | 97 °C | |
| Pipelines | 640 | 448 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 58.2 GTexel / s | 32.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 238 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,300 million | 3,100 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, DP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI | 1x DVI |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 248 mm |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Largeur | 2-slot | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 3 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 112 GB / s | 144.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7008 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Ansel | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| ShadowWorks | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) vs
ATIRadeon 2100 IGP
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) vs
NVIDIATesla C2050
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) vs
AMDRadeon HD 8530M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) vs
NVIDIANVS 810
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAQuadro M2000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAQuadro P620
