NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) vs AMD Radeon R9 280X

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) and AMD Radeon R9 280X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 39% higher boost clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 250 Watt
• Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
• Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6319 vs 6164

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 280X

• Around 92% higher texture fill rate: 128.0 GTexel / s vs 66.82 GTexel / s
• 2.7x more pipelines: 2048 vs 768
• Around 92% better floating-point performance: 4,096 gflops vs 2,138 gflops
• Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 677 vs 648
• Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 89.187 vs 75.758
• Around 70% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1434.496 vs 843.503
• Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.656 vs 5.071
• 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 87.459 vs 24.676
• Around 64% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 493.57 vs 301.168
• Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9603 vs 8496
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3336
• Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9603 vs 8496
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3336
• Around 1% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2351 vs 2337

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 280X

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	6319 6164
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	648 677
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	75.758 89.187
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	843.503 1434.496
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.071 7.656
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	24.676 87.459
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	301.168 493.57
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8496 9603
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3687 3700
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3336 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8496 9603
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3687 3700
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3336 3357
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	2337 2351

Compare specifications (specs)