NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) vs Intel Iris Graphics 5100
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) and Intel Iris Graphics 5100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 7x more core clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 200 MHz
- Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 19.2x more pipelines: 768 vs 40
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 22 nm
- 8.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6332 vs 738
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 650 vs 268
- 5.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 20732 vs 4035
- 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3687 vs 1019
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3336 vs 1668
- 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3687 vs 1019
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3336 vs 1668
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 25 October 2016 vs 27 May 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 1392 MHz vs 200 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1392 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 40 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 22 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6332 vs 738 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 650 vs 268 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 20732 vs 4035 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 vs 1019 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 vs 1668 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 vs 1019 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 vs 1668 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Graphics 5100
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 75 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
GPU 2: Intel Iris Graphics 5100
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) | Intel Iris Graphics 5100 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6332 | 738 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 650 | 268 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 20732 | 4035 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.676 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 | 1019 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 | 1668 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 | 1019 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 | 1668 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 305 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) | Intel Iris Graphics 5100 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Generation 7.5 |
| Code name | GP107 | Haswell GT3 |
| Launch date | 25 October 2016 | 27 May 2013 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $139 | |
| Place in performance rating | 487 | 1205 |
| Price now | $159.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 46.07 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1392 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1392 MHz | 200 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 768 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,138 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 22 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
| Pipelines | 768 | 40 |
| Texture fill rate | 66.82 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,300 million | 1,300 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | 145 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 112 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7 GB/s | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Shared memory | 0 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Ansel | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| VR Ready | ||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) vs
ATIFireGL V3400
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 4700 X2
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAGRID K240Q
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) vs
AMDRadeon R7 A265
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) vs
AMDRadeon RX 470 (Laptop)
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) vs
AMDRadeon RX 560X (Laptop)
