NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 60% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 120 Watt
- Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.676 vs 21.766
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 25 October 2016 vs 19 July 2016 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 120 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.676 vs 21.766 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 1392 MHz
- Around 23% higher boost clock speed: 1709 MHz vs 1392 MHz
- 2x more texture fill rate: 136.7 GTexel / s vs 66.82 GTexel / s
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 768
- 2x better floating-point performance: 4,375 gflops vs 2,138 gflops
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- 1144x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 7 GB/s
- Around 59% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10079 vs 6332
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 747 vs 650
- Around 71% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 35369 vs 20732
- Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 119.148 vs 75.758
- Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1373.562 vs 843.503
- Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.694 vs 5.071
- Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 454.799 vs 301.168
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12442 vs 8496
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12442 vs 8496
- 3x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 907 vs 305
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz vs 1392 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1709 MHz vs 1392 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 136.7 GTexel / s vs 66.82 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1280 vs 768 |
Floating-point performance | 4,375 gflops vs 2,138 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 7 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10079 vs 6332 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 747 vs 650 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 35369 vs 20732 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 119.148 vs 75.758 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1373.562 vs 843.503 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.694 vs 5.071 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 454.799 vs 301.168 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12442 vs 8496 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3691 vs 3687 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 vs 3336 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12442 vs 8496 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 vs 3687 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 vs 3336 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 907 vs 305 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6332 | 10079 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 650 | 747 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20732 | 35369 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 | 119.148 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 | 1373.562 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 | 8.694 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.676 | 21.766 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 | 454.799 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 | 12442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 | 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 | 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 | 12442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 | 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 | 3340 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 305 | 907 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
Code name | GP107 | GP106 |
Launch date | 25 October 2016 | 19 July 2016 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $139 | $299 |
Place in performance rating | 487 | 356 |
Price now | $159.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 46.07 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1392 MHz | 1709 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1392 MHz | 1506 MHz |
CUDA cores | 768 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,138 gflops | 4,375 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 16 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Pipelines | 768 | 1280 |
Texture fill rate | 66.82 GTexel / s | 136.7 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 120 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | 4,400 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | 250 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112 GB / s | 192.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7 GB/s | 8008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready |